A smartwatch that succeeds in making people forget it is technology is no longer quite an engineering feat: it has become a style argument. With five new colourways and genuine leather straps, Ice-Watch takes this stance further with its TKS 2.0, revealing in passing a broader shift in how the connected wrist is used.
Nothing in the slim rectangular case of the TKS 2.0 gives away the presence of an AMOLED screen, heart-rate sensors or sleep tracking. That has been the watch’s wager since launch: to look like a classic watch before looking like a connected object. The five new references (dark brown, cognac and burnt orange for the gold-tone cases, taupe grey and camel beige for the silver versions) change nothing about that promise. They reinforce it, swapping silicone straps for genuine leather, a material that belongs to no technological vocabulary and is associated rather with leather goods or traditional watchmaking.
The choice carries more weight coming from Ice-Watch, a brand built since 2007 on the exact opposite: coloured, highly recognisable silicone, offered in vivid shades across several hundred references. Seeing the house move towards leather and a restrained autumnal palette for its connected range says something about the distance an entire industry has travelled, between the openly assumed exuberance of past years and a form of restraint now sought even in the most accessible segments of the market.
This choice is not neutral in the current landscape of connected objects. For several seasons, part of the smartwatch market has been trying to free itself from the too-recognisable codes of the gadget (square dial, synthetic materials, clearly technical look) to move closer to the vocabulary of classic watchmaking. The TKS 2.0 belongs to that movement, but without ever giving up the functions that justify the word smart: Bluetooth calls and notifications, blood-oxygen and blood-pressure monitoring, sleep tracking, IP68 water resistance and a stated seven days of battery life.
The shift reflects a wider weariness with visible technology. Wearing an object whose function is immediately on display (a square touchscreen, flashing notifications) amounts to showing permanent availability, a continuous connection to the digital stream. By contrast, a watch that looks like a watch leaves the wearer free to reveal, or not, its connected side. It is a form of discretion that is not without echo of certain reflexes of classic luxury, where value is never shouted.
Leather also introduces a relationship to time that silicone utterly ignores. A synthetic material wears without transforming: it simply degrades. Leather develops a patina, changes shade, takes on the repeated gesture of the person who wears it. Placing a smartwatch within this relationship to wear, rather than within the more usual one in tech, that of planned obsolescence, amounts to lending it a temporality that no firmware can simulate.
The commercial wager is not trivial either. By betting on five leather variants rather than on a new wave of features, Ice-Watch chooses to sell a smartwatch the way a fashion watch is sold: through colour and material rather than through the spec sheet. It is a way of placing the TKS 2.0 on a different shelf from the crowded one of pure connected watches, closer to the even larger shelf of style accessories.
The fact remains that the TKS 2.0 is not a piece of high watchmaking and does not claim to be: it borrows its codes without claiming its status. That may be its real interest: an accessible way of exploring, day to day, the idea that the most accomplished technology is the one that no longer seeks to be noticed.
Cette publication est également disponible en :
